FAIR USE NOTICE

FAIR USE NOTICE

A BEAR MARKET ECONOMICS BLOG


This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates
FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates

All Blogs licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Three Ways Labor Can Fight Back

counterpunch

Time to Declare War

Three Ways Labor Can Fight Back

By DAVID MACARAY

There’s no denying it: In politics and commerce, slogans are gold. No matter how inane or inaccurate, a clever slogan has a good chance of changing public opinion. Recall Nike’s “Just Do It” campaign from some years ago. That ubiquitous slogan resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in Nike sales….despite no one even knowing what the hell it meant.

Politics is worse. Smearing a candidate as “tax-and-spend,” attacking national health care as “socialized medicine,” portraying government assistance as a “nanny state,” calling fixed time-tables for leaving Iraq or Afghanistan “surrender dates,” using “death panels” to frighten the elderly—all of these visceral appeals have worked.

What unions need to do is join the party. They need to streamline their message, make it less cerebral and more visceral. While smears, innuendo and wild generalizations aren’t tactics that necessarily make you proud, they are tactics that tend to work. And, as the man said: If you want to win, you don’t bring a knife to a gunfight.

Here are three approaches labor might consider taking.

Sponsor of the middle-class. Fortunately, the happy term “middle-class” still resonates with America, and, accordingly, the notion of the middle-class shrinking away (even though it’s happening before our eyes) still frightens people. Labor needs to pounce on this, make it their new equation: Sponsor of the middle-class = labor unions. Slogan: Since when was it a crime to want to be middle-class?

Labor must stop referring to groups or institutions as “anti-union.” That label won’t win enough supporters, not in today’s environment. Take the offensive and refer to them as “anti-middle-class.” Anti-people. Anti-family. Anti-prosperity. Merge this with the anti-government sentiment that exists in the country, turn it around and use it to expose those state governors who are trying to eliminate collective bargaining as tyrants. Power to the people….not the politicians!

Take what’s going on in Wisconsin and turn it into a Tea Party-like anthem. “Let the workers decide, not the government!” Depict what’s happening as a battle between good and evil—between the government and the workers—but make sure the public knows who the good guys are: police, firefighters, teachers. While nobody becomes a cop, teacher or fireman to get rich, they do hope to remain in the middle-class. What’s the government now telling them? That wanting to remain in the middle-class is now a crime? Have we as a country honestly fallen that far?

Patriotism. Accuse the anti-union forces of being “traitors,” of committing economic treason. Smear the anti-union forces the way progressives were smeared during the Red Scare days of the 1950s. Make it clear that if people really want to see some old-fashioned, patriots, all they need do is visit a union hall. Emphasize the fact that unlike Wall Street bankers, many union members are former military veterans. Also, publicize the fact that countries that are/were America’s enemies have outlawed labor unions.

Don’t be shy. Wave the flag. Buy ads that show union members proudly wearing their military uniforms, representing everything good about America. Contrast the U.S. with other countries. Use slogans like this: “North Korea bans labor unions.” Or this: “Union activists in Latin America are being systematically murdered.” And remind people that—unlike Wall Street bankers, who troll the world looking for profits—union members earn every nickel in this country, and spend every nickel here. Why? Because they’re patriots.

Don’t be shy about waving the flag. Indeed, patriotism could be the locus point where the Tea Party and labor intersect. Those anti-government TP’ers who say, “Give me back my country!” need to know that Big Business, in collusion with the government, is playing this country for suckers, maximizing profits while keeping working men and woman down, and that it’s only the unions who see working people as something more than “overhead.”

Safety net. The public needs to understand that without the resistance that unions provide, working people would be in economic free-fall, and that, in theory, they could continue falling until they hit the federal minimum wage ($7.25 per hour). And it’s labor’s job to let the public know that the same people who are out to destroy unions (e.g., U.S. Chamber of Commerce) are also on record as wanting to eliminate the minimum wage.

Labor needs to run ads using the example of Gen. Douglas MacArthur (a right-wing Republican) who insisted that post-World War II Japan establish labor unions. Why? Because MacArthur—Republican or not—knew that, without unions, management would have too big an advantage. Labor needs to quote Republican senator Orrin Hatch: “We need unions to make sure that working people have a legitimate and consistent voice.” (Business Week 5/9/94).

Because anti-union forces have declared war on labor, labor needs to declare war on them. And even though it could get ugly, we have to do it. They’re killing us here. Statistics show that the gap between rich and poor is widening. It’s time for unions to demonstrate not how reasonable they are, but how tough they can be. Worst case? We get our butts kicked. Best case? We put America back on track.

David Macaray, a Los Angeles playwright, is the author of “It’s Never Been Easy: Essays on Modern Labor”. He served 9 terms as president of AWPPW Local 672. He can be reached at dmacaray@earthlink.net

3 comments:

  1. yes I am a union member and have long been embarrased by our lingering public reputation, how it is used against us and how we don't fight back. It is very disheartening that the middle class is largely ignorant of the fact that unions have been representing and fighting for them, in fact, create the social class, for the past 125 years. My questions is, is our unwillingness to fight intelligently as you suggest here, due to lazyiness, a lack of intelligence or both?

    ReplyDelete
  2. haha, well at least you are saying it! One criticism, the font is fvery tiny here, could be bigger

    ReplyDelete
  3. We live in a Corporatocracy and not a Democracy. Corporatocracy, in social theories that focus on conflicts and opposing interests within society, denotes a system of government that serves the interest of, and may be run by, corporations and involves ties between government and business. Where corporations, conglomerates, and/or government entities with private components, control the direction and governance of a country, including carrying out economic planning notwithstanding the 'free market' label. The concept of corporatocracy is that corporations, to a significant extent "own" or have massive power over governments, including those governments nominally elected by the people, and that they exercise such power not by back-room conspiracies but by their enormous, concentrated economic power, and by legal in-the-open mechanisms (lobbyists, campaign contributions to office holders and candidates, threats to leave the state or country for another with less oversight and more subsidies etc). Oliver Stone captured "Wall Street, you could say..runs the world. Wall Street, the pharmaceutical lobbies, the oil lobbies, they run our government and shape our thought with their propaganda. If this is so, the problem is not ignorance but rather perception and world-view. It takes a crisis like this to shake our foundations.

    Font size is standard 12 point Arial. You can increase the font size with your browser's VIEW menu options by zooming in.

    ReplyDelete